
Presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, at the Baird Center on
November 03, 2024 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
October 10, 2025
Obama’s Omission: Praising Ceasefire Without Acknowledging Trump’s Role
Former President Barack Obama is facing criticism for his recent comments
regarding the Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement. While many welcomed the
news of a potential end to the conflict, some observers have noted Obama’s
failure to acknowledge the instrumental role President Donald Trump played in
brokering the deal.
In a post on X, Obama expressed his support for bringing an end to the
suffering in Gaza. He stated, “After two years of unimaginable loss and
suffering…we should all be encouraged…that an end to the conflict is
within sight.” However, the former president’s statement lacked any
recognition of President Trump’s efforts, specifically his 20-point peace
proposal, which many believe paved the way for the ceasefire.
Critics argue that Obama’s omission is a disservice to the progress made
under the current administration. They believe that acknowledging Trump’s
contribution would have demonstrated a sense of unity and a commitment to
peace that transcends political divides.
The absence of praise for President Trump was not lost on social media users.
Many commenters pointed out the perceived oversight, with some suggesting
that Obama deliberately avoided mentioning his successor’s name. One user
wrote, “This is a great opportunity to acknowledge Trump…and model the
unity you preach.”
Even Donald Trump Jr. weighed in on the matter, offering a succinct
revision of Obama’s statement: “I’ll finish it for you. ‘Thank you, Donald
Trump.'”
President Trump’s involvement in securing the ceasefire and hostage release
deal has been widely recognized, with some even calling for him to receive
the Nobel Peace Prize. His supporters argue that his decisive leadership
and innovative peace proposal were crucial in bringing the warring parties
to the negotiating table.
During a recent interview, President Trump responded to questions about Obama
previously receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, stating that the Democrat “got
the prize for doing nothing.”
These remarks sparked further debate about the criteria for awarding such
prestigious honors and the potential influence of political factors. Critics
of Obama’s Nobel Prize often point to the numerous military interventions
that occurred during his presidency, questioning whether his actions were
truly aligned with the pursuit of peace.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, the controversy surrounding
Obama’s recent statement serves as a reminder of the deep political divisions
that continue to shape public discourse. While many hope for a future where
leaders can come together to celebrate achievements regardless of party
affiliation, the current climate often makes such unity a difficult
aspiration to realize. The focus should remain on policies and leadership
that prioritize the safety and prosperity of the American people,
irrespective of political gamesmanship.


