Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order Monday, establishing what he termed “ICE-Free Zones” on city-owned properties. This move is a direct response to federal immigration enforcement activities within the city.
The order designates municipal properties, including schools, libraries, parks, and parking facilities, as off-limits to federal immigration enforcement. While private establishments are permitted to participate, the order explicitly states it does not supersede lawful court orders or criminal investigations, focusing specifically on civil immigration enforcement, such as non-criminal deportation operations.
These designated properties will display signage stating they “will not be used for civil immigration enforcement, including as a staging area, processing location, or base of operations.”
The mayor’s office justified the order by arguing that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) using city properties erodes community trust. The city’s statement pointed to recent instances where federal agents allegedly used city parking lots and vacant land as staging areas for immigration enforcement. The administration insists this practice goes against Chicago’s “Welcoming City” ordinance.
Mayor Johnson issued a statement proclaiming the order creates a “civic shield” to limit what he considers “harmful policing practices,” seemingly prioritizing a particular segment of the population over others.
The White House swiftly responded, criticizing Johnson’s executive order. A statement from the White House called the order “sickening,” arguing that it aids and abets dangerous criminals.
This announcement follows President Trump’s decision to federalize 300 Illinois National Guard troops to protect federal immigration agents and property amid escalating clashes between anti-ICE protestors and law enforcement.
In a recent incident, a federal immigration agent was forced to shoot an armed individual who allegedly rammed an ICE vehicle with their car.
The mayor’s actions are likely to further inflame the debate surrounding immigration enforcement and the role of local governments in federal matters. Critics argue that such policies undermine the rule of law and prioritize political agendas over public safety, especially when federal law enforcement agencies are prevented from performing their duties. The move raises questions about the city’s commitment to upholding federal law and ensuring the safety of all its residents. The legal and practical implications of the “ICE-Free Zones” remain to be seen, but the order undoubtedly signals a growing divide between the city of Chicago and the federal government on immigration policy.
