The 2025 Subaru Forester has undergone a redesign, but it remains true to its roots. This compact SUV retains its boxy shape, providing excellent visibility and versatility for those who enjoy the great outdoors. With various upgrades for the new model year, it stays competitive against others in its class. One of the key comparisons is with the 2025 Honda CR-V, a popular choice among small SUV buyers that offers a balanced mix of features and usability.
Space and Visibility
The Forester excels in visibility. Its boxy design, large windows, and slim roof pillars allow for an unobstructed view ahead. Additionally, wide door openings and well-placed seat heights make it particularly accommodating for older drivers. However, the CR-V takes the lead when it comes to space. With almost two additional inches of rear legroom and a significantly larger cargo area, it clearly wins for families needing more room. The CR-V also features improved interior storage solutions, including a more reliable wireless charging pad in its upper trims, while the Forester’s is prone to slipping.
Advantage: CR-V
Interior Technology
The Forester introduces an 11.4-inch touchscreen for 2025, yet it has been available on other Subaru models for some time. While the touchscreen can be slow, its large icons are user-friendly. Traditional buttons and analog gauges help users feel comfortable switching from older vehicles. The CR-V’s technology, while not cutting-edge, features a standard 7-inch screen, with an optional 9-inch screen that boasts modern graphics. Although both have physical controls, the CR-V feels a bit more current without being overwhelming.
Advantage: CR-V
Driving and Fuel Economy
For 2025, the Forester will introduce a hybrid version that promises better fuel economy and performance. Currently, its base engine—a four-cylinder with 180 horsepower—accelerates from zero to 60 mph in 9.2 seconds. While adequate for city driving, it may feel lacking for highway merges. In contrast, the CR-V shines with options for a 190-horsepower turbocharged engine or a hybrid boasting 204 horsepower, both of which provide quicker acceleration.
Fuel economy is relatively similar, with the Forester achieving an EPA estimate of 28-29 mpg combined, while the turbocharged CR-V also falls within that range. However, the hybrid versions take the edge, with the CR-V estimated at 37 mpg combined and the upcoming Forester Hybrid expected at 35 mpg. Overall, the steering and ride quality of the CR-V surpasses that of the Forester, making it a more enjoyable drive.
Advantage: CR-V
Conclusion
The results of this comparison favor the Honda CR-V, ranked as the second-best small SUV, while the Subaru Forester comes in at twelfth. Although the Forester is a good option for drivers who appreciate visibility and straightforward controls, the CR-V takes the lead for most buyers due to its family-friendly space, advanced technology, and superior driving experience.
In summary, while both vehicles have their strengths, the CR-V stands out, making it a smart choice for drivers in the compact SUV market.
