The Supreme Court is expected to support a Catholic Charities group from Wisconsin in its legal battle against a state ruling that the organization claims misrepresents and harms its mission to help the sick and the poor.
The Justice Department under former President Trump has submitted a brief backing Catholic Charities, emphasizing that federal tax exemptions, similar to those in Wisconsin law, are essential for the protection of religious institutions.
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Superior is challenging a decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court which stated that because the organization does not engage in what it defines as “typical” religious activities, it cannot be exempt from the state’s unemployment compensation program. The court’s ruling suggests that since Catholic Charities serves and employs non-Catholics and does not seek to convert anyone, it does not operate primarily for religious purposes.
Despite the ruling, Catholic Charities maintains that caring for those in need, including the disabled and elderly, is intrinsically linked to their religious practice. Their attorney, Eric Rassbach, from the Becket law firm specializing in religious freedom cases, argued that Catholic doctrine prohibits them from making assistance contingent upon acceptance of their beliefs. Rassbach criticized the Wisconsin court for suggesting that helping the needy cannot be considered a religious act simply because non-religious people also do so.
The charity seeks exemption from the state program to participate in the Catholic Church’s private program, which they claim would be more cost-effective than the state’s system.
During the court proceedings, many justices expressed concern about the state’s interference in religious practices. Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether it is fair or constitutional for the state to decide what qualifies as religious activity. He pointed out that evaluating the level of religious engagement in charity work could amount to excessive government involvement in faith matters.
Even some liberal justices raised apprehensions regarding Wisconsin’s stance. Justice Elena Kagan highlighted that it’s crucial not to favor one religion over another, especially based on specific teachings or doctrines.
Catholic Charities’ executive director expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would uphold their right to serve all in alignment with their faith.
Bishop James Powers of the Catholic Diocese of Superior remarked that Wisconsin’s position penalizes Catholic Charities for demonstrating Christian compassion. He emphasized that their assistance is rooted in their faith, reflecting the biblical Good Samaritan’s actions—helping those in need without regard to their beliefs.
As this case progresses, it underscores the ongoing tension between state regulations and the rights of religious organizations to operate according to their principles.
