Concerns Raised Over Potential Columbia University Hire
Columbia University is currently considering candidates for the Edward Said chair in Arab Studies, a tenured position, and one of the finalists has sparked debate. Rosie Bsheer, currently an associate professor of history at Harvard University, is among those being considered. However, her past actions and associations have raised concerns about potential bias.
Bsheer previously served as the associate director of Harvard’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies. During her time there, the center faced criticism for allegedly promoting a skewed perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Some critics argue that the center hosted speakers who seemed to excuse violence and terrorism against Israel, and gave a pass to October 7.
Notably, the Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance has publicly stated their belief that the Center for Middle Eastern Studies helped spread the idea that Israel is a colonial power that embodies racism. A report produced by Harvard itself said the center hosted speakers who “appeared to justify Hamas’ actions.”
Adding to the controversy, Bsheer publicly defended students who participated in anti-Israel protests at Harvard. She also praised a book by Rashid Khalidi, the previous holder of the Columbia chair, who has been a long outspoken critic of Israel. Khalidi has blamed Israel for the violence.
It’s important to note that associate professors at Harvard do not have tenure, while the Said chair at Columbia is a tenured position, offering significant job security.
The selection process occurs at a sensitive time for Columbia. The university recently settled with the federal government after concerns were raised about the safety and protection of Jewish students on campus. Critics argue that Bsheer’s appointment could undermine these efforts and signal a tolerance for anti-Israel sentiment.
Other candidates being considered for the position have also faced scrutiny. Some have defended individuals associated with Hamas and made statements that appear sympathetic to the organization.
Columbia University has stated that the views of individual candidates do not represent the university.
The university is currently under increased scrutiny to ensure fairness and balance in its academic programs. Appointing someone with a perceived bias could further damage the university’s reputation and alienate students and donors.
As Columbia University moves forward with its decision, the focus remains on ensuring a fair and balanced academic environment where all perspectives can be discussed openly and respectfully. The university faces the challenge of choosing a candidate who can foster genuine understanding and critical thinking without promoting hate or violence. The decision will have significant implications for the future of Arab studies at Columbia and the university’s commitment to intellectual diversity.
