It’s time to stop letting international bodies dictate our health policy. Another potential health crisis is brewing, and our leaders need to be proactive in defending our borders.
Key Takeaways:
- Ebola is spreading in Congo and Uganda.
- The WHO says the global risk is low, but the regional risk is high.
- Hundreds of suspected cases are under investigation.
The World Health Organization: Reliable Source or Globalist Agenda?
The head of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, announced Wednesday that the Ebola outbreak in Congo and Uganda poses a high risk at the national and regional levels. He downplayed the global risk. But can we truly trust these international bodies?
So far, 51 confirmed cases are in Congo’s Ituri and North Kivu provinces. Uganda reported two confirmed cases in its capital, Kampala. There are almost 600 suspected cases and 139 suspected deaths.
Ignoring the Obvious: Borders Matter
For too long, the left has preached open borders, ignoring the dangers posed by unchecked immigration. This isn’t about fear-mongering; it’s about common sense. We must prioritize the health and safety of our citizens.
The WHO’s assessment that the global risk is “low” should be met with skepticism. History has taught us that these organizations often underestimate threats. We need a strong, secure border to prevent potential outbreaks from reaching our shores. A proactive approach is always better than a reactive one.
What This Means for Our Future
This outbreak underscores the importance of national sovereignty and self-reliance. We cannot depend on international bodies to protect us. We need strong leadership that prioritizes American interests above all else.
We must invest in our own public health infrastructure and develop robust border security measures. Dependence on groups like the WHO leaves us vulnerable to their agendas. These organizations often prioritize globalist policies over the well-being of individual nations. This means promoting American made products and medical supplies instead of relying on hostile nations.
Are we willing to gamble with our health, or will we take a stand for national security?
