California Governor Gavin Newsom recently vetoed a bill aimed at increasing pay for state firefighters, despite the backdrop of some of the most severe wildfires in the state’s history that have heavily affected Los Angeles.
On Friday, Newsom shared his reasoning in a letter to the California State Assembly concerning the decision to reject Assembly Bill 1309. This bill sought to ensure firefighters in the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection would be compensated within 15% of the average salaries of similar ranks in local fire departments.
In his letter, Newsom acknowledged the good intentions behind the bill but expressed concerns about its financial impact. He pointed out that enforcing a mandated salary increase could create “significant cost pressures” for the state and could undermine the collective bargaining process, which he believes should determine employee salaries and benefits.
An analysis from the State Assembly estimated that the bill could have cost the state between $373 million and $609 million in its first year. Proponents of the bill argued that growing wildfires have put additional burdens on firefighters, making their work conditions more challenging.
Initially introduced in February by Republican Assembly Member Heath Flora, the bill aimed to offer firefighters higher pay to reflect their demanding roles, especially during tough fire seasons that have driven many Californians from their homes.
Moreover, a recent report highlighted concerns about staffing shortages and outdated procedures in LA County’s fire response system. It noted that the Los Angeles Fire Department has fewer than one firefighter for every 1,000 residents, indicating significant understaffing.
Despite acknowledging the challenges within Cal Fire, Newsom maintains that the financial burden of the proposed pay increase is too great. This winter, he had started a recruitment campaign to bolster staff within the firefighting service, demonstrating awareness of the growing need for more personnel.
Flora expressed disappointment about the veto, citing his own experience as a former firefighter. He believes that those who put their lives on the line to protect others deserve compensation that accurately reflects their responsibilities.
In contrast, Newsom’s administration has incurred substantial expenses elsewhere, raising eyebrows about budget priorities. Critics argue that the decision to veto the firefighter pay increase, while approving significant spending on other initiatives, may not align with the pressing needs of emergency responders in California.
