A House Republican is taking steps to eliminate the use of autopen technology for signing presidential pardons, calling it “irresponsible.” This move comes shortly after former President Donald Trump labeled pardons granted by President Joe Biden as “void,” arguing they were signed using this mechanical device.
Representative Buddy Carter from Georgia plans to introduce legislation known as the Signature Integrity for Granting National Pardons (SIGN) Act. This proposal aims to ensure that a sitting president must personally sign any pardon or reprieve, thereby banning the use of autopen technology.
Carter stated, “Biden’s use of an autopen should automatically void his presidential pardons. The SIGN Act will help restore the integrity of this significant responsibility in our justice system by ensuring that all pardons are signed by the Commander-in-Chief.”
This Republican-led initiative arises after Trump asserted that Biden’s last-minute pardons, which included those given to members of the investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot, were invalid due to being signed via autopen.
Carter also questioned Biden’s leadership, suggesting, “If Biden handed this important duty to staff and machines, what other critical decisions did he neglect during his time in office?”
Reports have emerged, citing findings from a conservative group, which claim that Biden has utilized autopen for signing many of his official documents. Trump contended that Biden was likely unaware of the pardons that were signed right before he left office, emphasizing that the necessary documents were not properly explained or approved by him.
Furthermore, energy advocacy groups are urging investigations into whether Biden’s executive orders affecting the energy sector were also signed using autopen without his knowledge. According to a 2005 ruling by the Justice Department, presidents can legally use autopen to sign bills into law.
This debate raises important questions about the accountability and authority of presidential actions. While some legal guidelines permit the use of such technology, many believe that significant decisions, like presidential pardons, deserve a personal touch from the president himself.
The conversation surrounding this issue continues, with calls for greater transparency and integrity in the process of granting pardons.
