House Oversight Chairman James Comer has criticized Special Counsel David Weiss’ recent report on Hunter Biden’s case, describing it as “incomplete” because of President Biden’s broad pardon of his son.
Comer stated, “Special Counsel David Weiss just released an incomplete 27-page report because President Joe Biden issued his son an unprecedented pardon. This sweeping pardon prevents the Special Counsel from holding Hunter Biden accountable for the international influence peddling that benefited from Joe Biden’s name.”
He went on to assert that the Biden Department of Justice would not prosecute the Biden family, stating that their investigation revealed Joe Biden’s knowledge and involvement in his family’s business dealings.
Weiss’ report, released Monday, covered his six-year investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes and his purchase of a gun while struggling with addiction. Hunter Biden was found guilty last year of multiple firearm offenses and pleaded guilty to failing to pay over $1.4 million in taxes.
Despite vowing not to pardon his son, President Biden chose to issue a blanket pardon last month for any potential offenses that could occur up until December 1, 2024. Comer emphasized that this move shields Hunter Biden from true legal accountability, saying, “Joe Biden will be remembered for using his last few weeks in office to protect himself and his son.”
He highlighted the testimonies of two IRS whistleblowers who claimed they were stifled in their investigation, preventing them from pursuing evidence against Joe Biden. Comer stated, “It’s time for a serious investigation and accountability.”
Weiss’ report mentioned concerns about President Biden’s portrayal of the prosecution as biased and unfair. The report argued that Hunter Biden’s past substance abuse could not justify his failure to pay significant taxes on income earned through his family connections.
Hunter Biden reportedly earned more than $7 million from 2016 to 2020, but failed to pay his taxes, which Weiss described as a conscious decision to prioritize personal expenses over legal obligations.
The findings raise essential questions about the influence of high-profile connections on legal proceedings and accountability in Washington. As the situation continues to unfold, many are calling for transparency and justice.
